South Africa

OUR BURNING ASSEMBLY ANALYSIS

Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe: Parliament arson accused ‘knew what he was doing’

Alleged arsonist Zandile Christmas Mafe in the Cape Town Magistrates’ Court on 11 January 2022. (Photo: Leila Dougan)

John Hlophe ruled that Zandile Mafe’s further detention at Valkenberg was unlawful ‘and should come to an end with immediate effect’.

Setting aside an order that National Assembly alleged arsonist Zandile Mafe be kept at Valkenberg psychiatric hospital for observation, Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe mused that he personally took Mafe’s word “for now” that he was “not mad, he knows what he was doing”.

The Judge President added that Mafe’s pro bono legal team, advocate Dali Mpofu and Luvuyo Godla, had conveyed as much to the court.

Mafe’s lawyers had been “wise enough”, added Hlophe, to say “no, we don’t believe what you are telling us, he knows what he is doing” with regard to an earlier one-page “cryptic” district surgeon’s assessment of Mafe diagnosing him as suffering from paranoid schizophrenia.

Reviewing and setting aside Cape Town magistrate Zamekile Mbalo’s decision to refer Mafe for 30 days’ psychiatric observation, Hlophe ruled that Mafe’s further detention at Valkenberg was unlawful “and should come to an end with immediate effect”.

Mafe, he added, should be placed in “a normal correctional facility and taken out of Valkenberg”.

On 11 January, prosecutor Helene Booysen informed the Cape Town Magistrates’ Court that a charge of destruction of essential infrastructure against Mafe had been dropped and that the 49-year-old would now be charged with contravening the Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act No 33 of 2004.

In other words, Mafe is accused of terrorism.

According to Mafe’s charge sheet, he intentionally “delivered, placed, discharged or detonated an explosive at Parliament on 2 January”.

In a Schedule 6 offence, the onus is on Mafe to provide evidence that shows exceptional circumstance which would permit his release on bail. 

On Tuesday, Hlophe said the magistrate had applied a “sledgehammer approach” to“condemn” Mafe for psychiatric observation and to “bump him out of the bail queue”.

Mafe’s bail application will be heard on Saturday, but he will not be in court as he has been diagnosed with Covid-19 and is required to isolate.

Prosecutor Mervyn Menigo said that the State would oppose bail and that it was prudent to bear in mind that a bail application was not a criminal hearing,

What still needed to be ascertained was whether Mafe was capable of understanding the application and the proceedings. 

“Any court would have to appraise itself that the applicant is following the proceedings and that the magistrate was not wrong down the line. Let’s play it forward into the future,” he suggested.

Menigo said the court hearing the bail application would still have to take into account Mafe’s state of mind. 

“Then we are back at square one and the bail court would be obliged to refer the accused.”

If Mafe were unable to understand “and we continue, that would not be due process, in my submission”, said Menigo.

Menigo submitted that the court deal with Mafe’s referral as it should have been dealt with, set aside the order and let a new magistrate “deal with it and properly ventilate issues arising”.

Hlophe remarked that at Mafe’s appearance in the magistrates’ court no one had bothered to greet him and that it would not have been irregular for the presiding officer to ask him a few questions to determine his state of mind. 

He added that there had also been “scant information” about Mafe’s “paranoid delusions”.

It is impossible to make a diagnosis in 24 hours… it is common sense. In the Mental Health Act, there is reference to 72 hours’ observation and assessment, not just once-off… you can’t say: ‘In my view, you are insane’,” said Hlophe. 

Observation for 72 hours, he said, would enable a doctor “to file a report that can be safely relied on by the court”.

The court heard that Mafe was legally represented and that his lawyers would be able to engage and consult with him before bringing the bail application on Saturday. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 8

  • The lowest rank in the police a constable,working outside knows that any pschyciatric evaluation of a unstable person as delusional or mentally unstable needs to be evaluated for 72 hours.This happens a lot with drug addicts wandering the streets talking to themselves,or where a family with a delusional family member be it through drugs abuse or any other mental issue happening in the house,must be transported to the nearest hospital,and then evaluated for a period of 72 hours.How did the state slip up here?The other observation was that Mr Mpofu(the drama queen)was so well behaved,no theatrics, no shouting!!!Could it be that he knows Mr Hlope as a RET champion?

    • Should be an interesting trial if Mafe is indeed mentally ill. Could lead to later referral for observation, endless delays and a not guilty verdict…

    • The 72 hour assessment does not refer to psycholegal assessments – it is to determine whether someone needs involuntary treatment for the safety of themselves or others. Psycholegal assessment is used to determine whether someone is able to stand trial/follow court proceedings or in some cases whether they can be held accountable or not (in case a mental illness influenced their behaviour). If Hlophe was quoted correctly, he clearly has a limited grasp of Mental Illness and the Mental Health Care Act. I also find it strange that he considers himself able to declare that Mr Mafe is well, but a health professional cannot decide that there are concerns about his mental health. And by the way, psycholegal assessments to determine ability to stand trial are often done by a single assessment….

  • No words! Hlope strikes again. Pontificating on mental health yet, as though he has even the vaguest knowledge about the topic! Then again, maybe he’s applying the much-vaunted Sisulu approach to the issue!

  • For Mafe, to get a lawyer like Dali Mpofu, there is something much bigger behind Mafe. Like Zuma or someone with lots of money, as Dali would certainly not tie himself up for years to come, for nothing. Lets hope it all comes out in the case to follow. Mafe, was hired by a syndicate of a faction opposing Ramaphosa. Our ANC government.

  • The process was wrong but scary how Mpofu and Hlophe don’t actually know that a person with paranoid delusions etc can’t report on the matter and it’s not easily observed by another. I think they gonna have to rerun the process but if the guy is unwell what they have done here is cruel.

  • This smells fishy. The Zondo report is released then suddenly crucial documents are destroyed in a National key point. Coincidentally known RET flag bearers are involved, Dali Mpofu defending him and J Hlophe trying the case. Extremely well orchestrated.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted