This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

The news sucks. But your reading experience doesn't have to. Help us improve that for you by registering for free.

Please create a password or click to receive a login link.

Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

Alcohol ban ahead of possible Covid-19 fourth wave in D...

Business Maverick


Alcohol ban ahead of possible Covid-19 fourth wave in December will be crippling, warns Pick n Pay’s Ackerman

A sign stands above the entrance to a Pick n Pay Stores Ltd. supermarket in Johannesburg, South Africa, on Monday, April 9, 2018. (Photo: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The grocery retailer said its recovery from the repeated alcohol sales bans since 2020 will be undermined by further bans. Pick n Pay lost R800-million in sales after the government moved the country into a Level 4 lockdown in June 2021, which banned the sale of liquor.

Pick n Pay chair Gareth Ackerman has criticised the government for its repeated bans on liquor sales since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic in early 2020, saying it is not relying on evidence for lockdown decisions that are damaging SA’s economy. 

Ackerman said there is a “wealth of evidence” to show that alcohol sales bans have little or no positive impact as a public health measure to curb the spread of Covid-19 because alcohol has been readily available on the black market. 

The government has been slammed by business executives and the liquor industry for its handling of lockdown regulations. Ackerman and other high profile executives have spoken out against the government for not listening to or consulting businesses on lockdown decisions, and not warning the alcohol industry before imposing sudden sales bans.

Ackerman said Pick n Pay is concerned that the national state of disaster, which was extended by another month to 15 November, is “being used by elements of the government to address liquor policy issues without resorting to constitutional processes. 

“It is of concern that liquor restrictions are being put in place for the local elections. We need to focus on getting the country vaccinated rather than putting further restrictions on citizens’ rights,” said Ackerman on Wednesday at Pick n Pay’s half-year results presentation. 

Ackerman is worried that the government might implement another alcohol sales ban should the fourth wave of Covid-19 infections hit the country over the December holiday period. 

He has implored the government to “heed the evidence” and “resist the temptation” to implement further restrictions on the sale of alcohol, which has “an immensely negative impact on jobs, on the economy, on confidence in our Covid response”. 

Pick n Pay, which sells liquor in addition to food, household merchandise and clothing, was hard hit by the alcohol bans. The retailer lost R800-million in sales after the government moved the country into a Level 4 lockdown in June 2021, which banned the sale of alcohol in response to the third wave of Covid-19 infections. 

Pick n Pay’s liquor business lost 55 trading days during the Level 4 lockdown, over and above the 209 lost trading days it incurred in 2020. 

Ackerman said further bans in alcohol sales will harm Pick n Pay’s operations, but also the broader alcohol industry which supports around one million jobs across the value chain (from manufacturing to point of sale) and contributes about R72-billion annually in tax payments to the fiscus.

Pick n Pay’s sales were also disrupted by the July unrest, which left the retailer’s 212 stores in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal — 10% of its 2,039 store network — damaged and looted. About 45 of the damaged stores are still closed. Pick n Pay said the unrest cost it R930-million in lost sales because many stores were shut while being repaired. Most of the losses have been covered by insurance. 

Despite the disruptive unrest and alcohol sales bans, Pick n Pay grew sales by 4.1% to R46-billion for the six months ending on 29 August 2021. Profit after tax rose 87% to R296.8-million over the same period, with Pick n Pay declaring a 35.8 cents per share dividend, up 91% year on year. 

Boone’s turnaround strategy 

This was the first set of results delivered by new CEO Pieter Boone, who replaced Richard Brasher on 21 April. Boone said he is still optimistic about SA’s retail market and has not been deterred by the July unrest or the government’s approach to lockdown regulations. 

The retailer is planning to invest about R2.5-billion into SA’s economy in 2021 and inject a similar amount of capital in 2022 and 2023. The capital will go towards opening new Pick n Pay stores (64 new stores from 2021) and a distribution centre in Gauteng. 

Before Brasher’s appointment in 2013, Pick n Pay had lost its way; it implemented many failed turnaround strategies dating back to Nelson Mandela’s presidency. Pick n Pay neglected its stores by not upgrading them, service at stores deteriorated and costs ballooned as it didn’t modernise its IT or distribution systems. This led to Pick n Pay losing market share to rivals such as Checkers and Woolworths.

But Pick n Pay has now been stabilised. 

Boone’s main strategy for growth involves opening more stores, especially those that target low-to-middle income consumers. He said SA’s food and grocery market will grow by R200-billion over the next five years, to be worth R850-billion. 

The low-to-middle income consumer segment will contribute the most to this growth, which presents “many opportunities” for Pick n Pay to grow its exposure by opening more than 100 new stores of its Boxer brand in the next three years.  

Boone has also identified R3-billion in additional cost savings till 2025, which will be invested in promotions to keep the cost of consumer goods low. DM/BM


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 7

  • PicknPay survived without liquor sales – so no sympathy at all. I wonder how many small bottle stores went under when PicknPay entered the market. Also, alcohol abuse, an epidemic in this country, fills up our hospitals with victims of violence and car accidents- that’s why it’s banned. The real question is why food is so expensive and yet we have some of the cheapest alcohol in the world! Tax alcohol the way petrol is taxed to pay for all the hospital care and misery it causes. I wonder how much the liquor industry ‘donates to the ANC- a lot is my guess.

      • Gerrie you are forgetting the massive amount of manhours that are lost just as a result of the sale of liquor – oh yes directly it is the consumption but sale is a necessary precursor to consumption. Liquor is not job friendly.

  • While I dont believe bans on alcohol, and cigarettes as well, were necessary nationally the CEO is being very dishonest as there is clear evidence about the affect of these bans on death and injury which required medical treatment and hospitalization. As with the latest wave there were a few weeks when the hospitals in Cape Town had run out of ICU beds. Without the alcohol ban the normal additional demand on beds would have exceeded what is available and there would have been additional deaths. That said any such bans should be limited only during the time when ICU beds are in short supply. Also the alcohol industry really need to come to the party to manage alcohol abuse, injury and death.

  • Just look at the evidence. PnP has one object in mind – it wants to rip off the public. It needs its liquor outlets to augment this strategy. Anyone can conduct their own survey. The prices of food items at PnP are always higher than Checkers, Shoprite and even Spar in many instances. I do not follow or compare liquor prices but I would be surprised if a similar pattern didn’t apply. PnP Smart Shopper programme is designed to make the alleged benefits it claims inaccessible to many members. (Has PnP ever made public how much in unclaimed Smartshopper Rands it is sitting on?) No PnP don’t try and twist the facts. The liquor bans during Covid lockdown may have been tough on business but they have been good for health – but then who at PnP really cares at all for the good of the public? All the PnP cares about is PROFIT.

  • I doubt people consumed less in aggregate over the past year, so these bans merely shift when and from where people buy (and at what premium)

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted